Washington Post Weighs in on Obama’s Distortions
April 2nd, 2008 at 07:47pm Matt DiBari
The Fact Checker at Washington Post has finally weighed in on The Leader of the New Politics’ repeated distortions of John McCain’s comments on the Iraq War.
At one time or another, both Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton have said that the presumptive Republican nominee is willing to fight a 100-year war in Iraq. When challenged about this claim on Monday, Obama referred journalists to the YouTube version of the Derry Townhall meeting. But the YouTube clip does not back up his case.
The Pinocchio Test
A more honest line of attack for the Democrats against McCain would be his support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, whether or not he has a clear strategy for winning the war, and the feasibility of a long-term occupation of a Muslim country by the United States. Instead of attacking him on these grounds, they have twisted his words, by claiming that he “wants” to fight a 100-year war.
I’ve said it before, but for the Candidate of Hope and the New Politics, Barack Obama certainly resorts to old style political deception an awful lot.
UPDATE, by Matt Margolis: Lots of others are also calling out Obama for distorting McCain’s words.
He offered those as possible timelines, but only hypothetically, to make his points that terrorism had rendered the region unstable and that he would support a continued troop presence if warranted. But the timetables, flippantly tossed out, have been condensed into sound bites by his Democratic opponents, turned into fund-raising appeals and mashed into YouTube parodies.
Many of the sound bites mischaracterize and distort what was said in Mr. McCain’s six-minute exchange on Jan. 3
No, John McCain is not proposing a 100-year war in Iraq.
The future Republican presidential nominee and the Democrats vying to run against him in the fall are engaged in a debate of sorts over how long U.S. troops should stay in Iraq and under what circumstances.
That’s a genuine point of contention. But Hillary Rodham Clinton and especially Barack Obama have distilled McCain’s position into sound bite oversimplifications, suggesting he foresees a war without end in anyone’s lifetime.
FactCheck.org had debunked this back in February, but that hasnt’ stopped Obama or Hillary from deliberately lying for their own political means.
Entry Filed under: Barack Obama, Campaign Issues, John McCain, Military




6 Comments Add your own
1. Geoff | April 2nd, 2008 at 8:17 pm
I thought Sen. Obama wasn’t a typical politician?
2. Washington Post Weighs in&hellip | April 2nd, 2008 at 8:56 pm
[…] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptI’ve said ir before, but for the Candidate of Hope and the New Politics, Barack Obama certainly resorts to old style political deception an awful lot. del.icio.us Reddit Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo co.mments … Read the rest of this great post here […]
3. Blogs For Victory »&hellip | April 2nd, 2008 at 9:49 pm
[…] at 10:49pm Matt Margolis How is Barack Obama distorting John McCain’s comments on Iraq? Check out our McCain blog for the […]
4. Matt DiBari | April 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Geoff, Obama is the New Hope and Change and YESWECAN. Clearly you didn’t get the memo.
Or maybe you got the memo and threw it out because it went against reality.
5. Freedom1 | April 2nd, 2008 at 11:55 pm
“Or maybe you got the memo and threw it out because it went against reality.” - Matt
Bwahaha! That’s good!
6. Kurt Diekelman | April 3rd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
I notice the Dems have very little to say here. Facts are stubborn things, huh?
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed