Comments on: Senator McCain’s Statement on Barack Obama and National Security http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/ Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:50:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: J Mora http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/#comment-1084 J Mora Thu, 22 May 2008 15:29:40 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/#comment-1084 On the Election 2008, as one who has defended the Constitution of the United States for 14 years, I am disappointed that it may have all been in vain if the stupidity of the general public elects Barrack Obama to the Commander in Chief's duty position. Any attorney who answers questions with gartbled answers is either a bad lawyer, or a genius (so he can't make sense to the court). I choose to believe that Barrack Obama has too much undesireable baggage for me to even consider him as a Commander in Chief. Billary Clinton, with all the immoral, and illegal scandals that the Clinton Administration brought to the White House, and White Water, I'll pass on that ticket...although some of what Hillary Clinton has brought as her platform is desireable. The problem there is you can promise the world, and never deliver it. So Hillary and her husband are out of the question. McCain is plausible but being a veteran and a POW that was subjected to torture for 7 years scares me. While I have been in the Military, I have seeen the effects of the Vietnam War on its veterans. McCain would be my pick out of the three mentioned. I would like Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee to be his running mate but unlike other Republican Presidents...I would like him to hit the proverbial nail on the head and fix what past presidents could not and would not fix. What is that?...Reduce our dependency on Arab Oil, Increase public transportation, bring back big business to the USA, regulate the price of gasoline, stop making concessions to OPEC, France, and Germay, we need to take care of our own before the needs of the world. WQe fed the Russians while they were our adversaries in the Cold War... honestly, does that make sense? Stop borrowing from China to dump it into Iraq. It is clear that Iraq does not appreciate what we have done at such an expense, it's time we leave it in their laps. Bring our men and women home. Rebuild the national arsenal and become the world power we once were. We need to focus on National Security before the rest of the world. We need to feed, educate, and house our people before we take on any other problems of the world. USA 1st, everyone else second. On the Election 2008, as one who has defended the Constitution of the United States for 14 years,
I am disappointed that it may have all been in vain
if the stupidity of the general public elects Barrack Obama to the Commander in Chief’s duty position.
Any attorney who answers questions with gartbled answers is either a bad lawyer, or a genius (so he can’t make sense to the court).
I choose to believe that Barrack Obama has too much undesireable baggage for me to even consider him as a Commander in Chief.
Billary Clinton, with all the immoral, and illegal scandals that the Clinton Administration brought to the White House, and White Water, I’ll pass on that ticket…although some of what Hillary Clinton
has brought as her platform is desireable. The problem there is you can promise the world, and never deliver it. So Hillary and her husband are out of the question.
McCain is plausible but being a veteran and a POW that was subjected to torture for 7 years scares me. While I have been in the Military, I have seeen the effects of the Vietnam War on
its veterans. McCain would be my pick out of the
three mentioned. I would like Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee to be his running mate but unlike other Republican Presidents…I would like him to hit the proverbial nail on the head and fix what past presidents could not and would not fix. What is that?…Reduce our dependency on Arab Oil, Increase public transportation, bring back big business to the USA, regulate the price of gasoline,
stop making concessions to OPEC, France, and Germay, we need to take care of our own before the needs of the world. WQe fed the Russians while they were our adversaries in the Cold War…
honestly, does that make sense? Stop borrowing from China to dump it into Iraq. It is clear that Iraq does not appreciate what we have done at such an expense, it’s time we leave it in their laps.
Bring our men and women home. Rebuild the national arsenal and become the world power we once were. We need to focus on National Security
before the rest of the world.
We need to feed, educate, and house our people before we take on any other problems of the world. USA 1st, everyone else second.

]]> By: Christian Wright http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/#comment-1080 Christian Wright Thu, 22 May 2008 11:55:51 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/#comment-1080 Since it was very much in Iran's interest for the U.S. to invade Iraq, it would have been natural for Iranian agents to have done what they could to promote that invasion. (Four years ago, Ted Galen Carpenter of CATO called for an investigation on that issue.) And indeed we now know that was the case: Ahmed Chalabi, who did more than any other Iraqi to stir up the U.S. against Saddam Hussein, turns out to be working for Teheran (specifically for the head of the Revolutionary Guard's Quds Force, formally proclaimed by the Senate as a terrorist organization). Of course, Chalabi couldn't move American policy without hiring American lobbyists to move American politicians: lobbyists such as Randy Scheunemann and Charlie Black, and politicians such as John McCain. I have no reason to believe that Scheunemann and Black knew they were doing Teheran's bidding, though it should have been obvious that the course of action they helped promote would have as one of its side-effects a big enhancement of Iran's regional power. McCain was doing Iran's bidding when he supported the invasion of Iraq. Iran wanted Saddam removed from power but could not do it on their own. Iran knew that the Shia majority of the population of Iraq was loyal to Iran because Iran gave them shelter during Saddam's ethnic cleansing campaign. Bush wanted to invade Iraq for the oil, and Iran wanted the US to invade Iraq because it knew it would make them far more powerful while destroying the US armed forces. McCain was played by the Iranians and he is still too senile to know it. We cannot put a guy that can be fooled by our enemies in the White House. Since it was very much in Iran’s interest for the U.S. to invade Iraq, it would have been natural for Iranian agents to have done what they could to promote that invasion. (Four years ago, Ted Galen Carpenter of CATO called for an investigation on that issue.) And indeed we now know that was the case: Ahmed Chalabi, who did more than any other Iraqi to stir up the U.S. against Saddam Hussein, turns out to be working for Teheran (specifically for the head of the Revolutionary Guard’s Quds Force, formally proclaimed by the Senate as a terrorist organization).

Of course, Chalabi couldn’t move American policy without hiring American lobbyists to move American politicians: lobbyists such as Randy Scheunemann and Charlie Black, and politicians such as John McCain. I have no reason to believe that Scheunemann and Black knew they were doing Teheran’s bidding, though it should have been obvious that the course of action they helped promote would have as one of its side-effects a big enhancement of Iran’s regional power.

McCain was doing Iran’s bidding when he supported the invasion of Iraq. Iran wanted Saddam removed from power but could not do it on their own. Iran knew that the Shia majority of the population of Iraq was loyal to Iran because Iran gave them shelter during Saddam’s ethnic cleansing campaign.

Bush wanted to invade Iraq for the oil, and Iran wanted the US to invade Iraq because it knew it would make them far more powerful while destroying the US armed forces.

McCain was played by the Iranians and he is still too senile to know it. We cannot put a guy that can be fooled by our enemies in the White House.

]]> By: Danish Artist http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/#comment-1059 Danish Artist Wed, 21 May 2008 20:25:38 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/05/21/senator-mccains-statement-on-barack-obama-and-national-security/#comment-1059 mr. Obama, what iteration are we on now?????? mr obama what is your instantaneous stand on the ME, the war in Iraq, appeasement er diplomacy? It just gets so confusing. mr. Obama, what iteration are we on now??????

mr obama what is your instantaneous stand on the ME, the war in Iraq, appeasement er diplomacy?

It just gets so confusing.

]]>