McCain’s Handling of the Georgia Russia Conflict
August 11th, 2008 at 01:53pm KMorrison
The Washington Post’s David Broder: “It’s Particularly A Moment Where John McCain Can Claim To Have Been Prescient.” NBC’s DAVID GREGORY: “David Broder, is this a 3 a.m. moment for foreign policy for these candidates?” WASHINGTON POST’s DAVID BRODER: “It is and it’s particularly a moment where John McCain can claim to have been prescient. Because in his basic foreign policy speech two months ago and in an interview that I did with him last week, he draws a very sharp line when it comes to Russia. He says these people are being aggressive and imperialist. There is no confusion, in his mind, about the character of the Putin-Medvedev government and he is prepared, I think, to make the case that this is a demonstration of exactly what he has been arguing for.” (NBC’s “Meet The Press,” 8/10/08)Watch David Broder This Morning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlwSigcsK5U
The Politico’s Jonathan Martin: John McCain “Appears To Have Been Ahead Of The Curve In His Assessment That Moscow Was The Bad Actor Here.” “When violence broke out in the Caucasus Friday morning, John McCain quickly issued a statement that was far more strident toward the Russians than that of President Bush, Barack Obama and much of the West. But, as Russian warplanes pounded Georgian targets far beyond South Ossetia this weekend, Bush, Obama and others have moved closer to McCain’s initial position. It has been a rough few weeks for McCain on the foreign policy front — paging Dr. Maliki — but he appears to have been ahead of the curve in his assessment that Moscow was the bad actor here.” (Jonathan Martin, “McCain Prescient On Russia?” The Politico, 8/10/08)
Chicago Tribune’s Jill Zuckman: “It’s Not Just This Part Of The World, But Senator McCain Has Been To So Many Exotic Places Like Waziristan And South Ossetia, And He’s Very Comfortable With These Issues. He Knows What He Thinks.” “And it’s not just this part of the world, but Senator McCain has been to so many exotic places like Waziristan and South Ossetia, and he’s very comfortable with these issues. He knows what he thinks. He’s been in contact with the leaders involved in these places for many, many years. So it’s really sort of a perfect thing for him. And so the question is each time something like this pops up randomly, we may see a cautiousness on the one hand by Senator Obama who has not been dealing with these things for years and maybe a little more aggressive voice from Senator McCain. And I’ll just tell you his favorite thing to say about Vladimir Putin is, When I look into his eyes, I see a K, a G and a B. ‘ He’s been very, very tough on Putin for quite some time.” (Fox News’ “Fox News Sunday,” 8/10/08)
From JohnMcCain.com: John McCain “Prescient” On Russia And Putin
Entry Filed under: John McCain



14 Comments Add your own
1. congressive | August 11th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
And I’ll just tell you his favorite thing to say about Vladimir Putin is, When I look into his eyes, I see a K, a G and a B. ‘ He’s been very, very tough on Putin for quite some time.” (Fox News’ “Fox News Sunday,” 8/10/08)
Putin obviously hasn’t noticed just how tough McSame is, or he’d have pulled out of Georgia the first time Sydney III gave him the stink-eye.
Q: When will neocons learn that isolationism and threats of military actions have achieved NOTHING but war, war and more war?
A: Trick question. That’s actually their plan. And it has worked brilliantly to militarize most of the planet. Peace is boring. War = Profits.
2. Joe | August 12th, 2008 at 8:19 am
km, what is up with the headline?
McCain’s Handling of the Georgia Russia Conflict
What exactly did he “handle”? The guy is a Senator and Presidential NOMINEE.
McCain sounds like he will follow the same “diplomacy” as the current disaster of an Administration. Start bombing immediately!!!
3. KMorrison | August 12th, 2008 at 10:23 am
Fair criticism Joe; wasn’t quite sure what to title it. Don’t typically re-post reviews and quotes like that, but thought it would be a bit of a stretch to for me to pretend that I had some deep knowlege of the Georgian Russian conflict.
The element that I can report on is that Senator McCain has shown concern about Russia for quite some time and has been critical of Bush’s ‘looking into his soul’ remark.
I would argue that this is quite different from Iraq, in that reports are stating that this is clearly Russian aggression towards Georgia. Protecting a sovereign nation is definitely different than invading and overthrowing the government of Iraq. Also, McCain is asking for a reaction from the UN Security Council an absolutely reasonable request.
4. Joe | August 12th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Fair enough KM. Just giving you a hard time with the headline.
Having said that and recognizing that their statements and opinions really have NO effect on the conflict… there really is nothing different between what McCain said/did and what Obama said/did.
Obama:
McCain:
The only difference I know of is that McCain has been rather antagonistic in his comments towards Putin and Russia in general in the past. That is not a great way to carry out diplomacy with a foreign power.
5. KMorrison | August 12th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Except that Putin really appears to be pushing the boundaries of acceptable behavior. Medvedev appears to be his puppet, and now McCain’s previous statements about Russia’s desire to reconstitute the old USSR boundaries seems dead on. Not sure it’s a bad thing to have someone willing to call them on their bad behavior.
-Senator Biden just put out a statement too. Looks like the consensus is that Russian behavior is unacceptable in a variety of ways.
6. SEW | August 13th, 2008 at 10:53 am
McCain may be ahead on foreign policy, but Obama wins on health care. He has it down cold to the penny. And this is without a teleprompter for everyone who says he needs one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omHUsRTYFAU
7. congressive | August 13th, 2008 at 10:55 am
I really can’t believe you Republicans are REALLY supporting the George Soros puppet government of Georgia:
Soros has publicly committed himself to funding the “democratic” presidency of Mikhail Saakashvili, just as he has publicly committed himself and his money to the destruction of the presidency of George W. Bush, whom he has compared to Yasser Arafat and Hitler. Soros and the United Nations are paying the wages of all of Saakashvili’s top government officials–ministers, deputies, the road police, and others
READ THIS STORY FROM KRISTOL’S WEEKLY STANDARD
8. Joe | August 13th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
I have to say… with all the attention that has been given to Obama associates, acquaintances, and advisors, why doesn’t anyone really bring this up?
If this was one of Obama’s aides that was lobbying for Georgia and advising Obama at the same time, the collective right-wing would have had a complete and utter breakdown. All hell would have broken loose and the collective right-wing would have been at Obama headquarters with pitchforks.
But it is McCain… so I guess it is all okie-dokie.
9. Joe | August 13th, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Again…. All this talk about “questionable acquaintances” of Obama.
Just asking what would be said by the right-wing talking heads if it was Obama that had this acquaintance??? I’m guessing they’d be calling for Obama to step down……. even more than they currently are.
10. KMorrison | August 13th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
First, I’ll DQ myself from answering what the right wing or Republican party would do/act, but here’s my take. 1. Serously doubt Soros ties had anything to do with McCain’s foreign policy decissions, seems rather counterintuitive. Though frankly I have no answer for Soros’ involvement in the Georgian government. 2. Don’t see a real conflict in having a lobbyist for Georgia on staff. Georgia was invaded; McCain’s reaction being influenced by a staffer seems to be a bit of a stretch. How would his reaction have changed if he didn’t have that aid on staff? 3. McCain was one of the people that pushed for the investigation of Abramoff, and that was not appreciated by Republicans. Frankly that’s one of the things I like about him; he fights corruption and if one of his guys gets ensnared in the process then so be it.
As for Obama associates. I see Wright as fair game because he had a long standing relationship with him, and he was even connected with his campaign. Personally I don’t write about some of his briefer associations because I’m unsure of what that association really is. However, I don’t think those criticisms are off limits. I do wish people would stop criticizing his wife. Technically, some of her comments made on the campaign trail make her fair game, but I don’t like. Think the families should be left alone.
11. Mary | August 14th, 2008 at 4:41 am
This week that red phone did ring, figuratively, at 3 A.M. McCain, instantly awake, picked it up said, in effect, “Russia, get out, and take your tanks wih you.” Obama, nine-tenths asleep, picked it up and said, in effect, “Why can’t we all just get along?” McCain sounded like a President. Obama sounded like … a ninny.
12. congressive | August 14th, 2008 at 11:40 am
Mr. Saakashvili’s latest show of bravado came only a day after Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that she and a special State Department envoy had explicitly and repeatedly warned him not to take any military action against Georgian separatists that might provoke Russia, cautioning that the United States was not prepared to back him militarily if he did.
Why is McCain undermining official United States foreign policy with his bluster? Oh, yeah. He got paid by Soros-puppet Saakashvili, that’s why.
Man, it was EMBARASSING to see Saakashvili actually name McCain as a big-hat-no-cattle politician. Guess he felt cheated for paying all that money for nothing.
No, Mr. McCain, we are NOT all Georgians. Some of us are the dead souls of the autonimous Ossetian people, gunned down in cold blood by this Georgian tyrant.
13. KMorrison | August 14th, 2008 at 12:40 pm
C - That has to be one of the most bizarre theories you’ve floated to date. Both McCain and Obama have condemned Russia’s aggression, and the only one to have demanded the removal of Saakashvili is Putin. A number of these small countries that were formerly part of the USSR are standing by Saakashvili. While I’m no expert on Soros, the idea that McCain is making decissions based on Soros’ desires is loopy considering Soros has given huge dollars in attempts to defeat McCain.
14. congressive | August 14th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
It is loopy, isn’t it? But it’s KRISTOL’S Weekly Standard that reported the story, not me.
READ IT FOR YOURSELF: Georgia on His Mind - George Soros’s Potemkin Revolution.
Don’t trust me. You are getting punked by all these players.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed