Comments on: Barack Obama Figures Out New Line of Attack Against Palin… http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/ Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:45:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Joe http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4059 Joe Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:48:10 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4059 neil, thanks for that great comeback of "It really shows your lack of knowledge". You do sound like a true idiot. How is that? Are we now just calling people names? Grow up please. Did I say the executive branch makes laws? I’ll help you… no I didn’t. And as for what I am afraid of is someone that may get into office that reflect the views of people like you who just call Supreme Court Justices “Activist Judges” just because they ruled against what you believe in. Guess what, if justices now get in and overturn Roe v Wade, why are <i>THEY</i> not “Activist Judges”? It would only stand to reason that it hasn’t been overturned yet, so new justices that rule to overturn it must only be doing so to be an “Activist Judge”. Grow up and come up with a legit argument instead of just calling people names. neil,
thanks for that great comeback of “It really shows your lack of knowledge”. You do sound like a true idiot. How is that? Are we now just calling people names? Grow up please.

Did I say the executive branch makes laws? I’ll help you… no I didn’t.

And as for what I am afraid of is someone that may get into office that reflect the views of people like you who just call Supreme Court Justices “Activist Judges” just because they ruled against what you believe in. Guess what, if justices now get in and overturn Roe v Wade, why are THEY not “Activist Judges”? It would only stand to reason that it hasn’t been overturned yet, so new justices that rule to overturn it must only be doing so to be an “Activist Judge”.

Grow up and come up with a legit argument instead of just calling people names.

]]> By: neil http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4056 neil Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:16:46 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4056 Joe, It really shows your lack of knowledge... The executive branch cannot now or ever legislate laws. The president does select Supreme court justices though and that may be what you are afraid of. Roe v. Wade is flawed because it was because of activist judges reading something in the constitution that just is not there. Show me just where the constitution guarantees a woman control of killing a baby in her womb. Joe,
It really shows your lack of knowledge… The executive branch cannot now or ever legislate laws. The president does select Supreme court justices though and that may be what you are afraid of. Roe v. Wade is flawed because it was because of activist judges reading something in the constitution that just is not there. Show me just where the constitution guarantees a woman control of killing a baby in her womb.

]]> By: Joe http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4053 Joe Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:41:19 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4053 First of all Matt. The article you link is from 2003. Try something a little more recent… <blockquote><a href="http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=830" rel="nofollow">Source>Source</a> November 9, 2007 The latest Harris Poll finds that support for Roe v. Wade has increased fairly significantly in a relatively short time. A majority – 56 percent – now favors the U.S. Supreme Court decision, the highest level since 1998 and an increase of seven percentage points from just last year when a slender 49 to 47 percent is supported the decision. Furthermore, only 20 percent of U.S. adults favor not permitting a woman to get an abortion under any circumstances. </blockquote> 20% favor no abortion under <i>ANY</i> circumstances. Isn’t that Palin’s view? Palin: <blockquote> Palin believes abortion is only acceptable if a woman’s life is in danger. During a debate in 2006, the candidates were asked what they would do if their own daughters became pregnant through rape. Palin’s response: “I would choose life.” </blockquote> And McCain (from his own website): <blockquote> John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench. </blockquote> Those sure sound like comments that would indicate they are <b>for</b> making it illegal. Meanwhile you claim “<i>the obviously false accusations of the ad</i>”. Also, your comment “<i>the ad is based on the premise that abortion is a women’s issue and women are, by default, pro-abortion.</i>” is silly and it is what YOU want to believe. Nobody is “pro-abortion”. Nobody thinks it is a good idea and wants to go get one on a regular basis. Nobody is pushing anyone to get an abortion. Those are all just far right-wing talking points because to you people there is no gray area. It is strictly black and white and that is it. No… they are not pro-abortion... They are pro-choice. The opportunity to make that decision based on <i>their own</i> circumstances. Why the hell should a 72 year old white man tell women what the can or can not do when it comes to their situation? Kimberly: <i> They are furious about the disgusting tactics the Obama campaign has used against Sarah Palin </i> “Disgusting tactics” used against Sarah Palin?? What exactly did Obama do that was anything against Sarah Palin? This is the first ad mentioning her. First of all Matt. The article you link is from 2003. Try something a little more recent…

Source>Source
November 9, 2007
The latest Harris Poll finds that support for Roe v. Wade has increased fairly significantly in a relatively short time. A majority – 56 percent – now favors the U.S. Supreme Court decision, the highest level since 1998 and an increase of seven percentage points from just last year when a slender 49 to 47 percent is supported the decision. Furthermore, only 20 percent of U.S. adults favor not permitting a woman to get an abortion under any circumstances.

20% favor no abortion under ANY circumstances. Isn’t that Palin’s view?

Palin:

Palin believes abortion is only acceptable if a woman’s life is in danger. During a debate in 2006, the candidates were asked what they would do if their own daughters became pregnant through rape. Palin’s response: “I would choose life.”

And McCain (from his own website):

John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench.

Those sure sound like comments that would indicate they are for making it illegal. Meanwhile you claim “the obviously false accusations of the ad”.

Also, your comment “the ad is based on the premise that abortion is a women’s issue and women are, by default, pro-abortion.” is silly and it is what YOU want to believe.
Nobody is “pro-abortion”. Nobody thinks it is a good idea and wants to go get one on a regular basis. Nobody is pushing anyone to get an abortion. Those are all just far right-wing talking points because to you people there is no gray area. It is strictly black and white and that is it.
No… they are not pro-abortion… They are pro-choice. The opportunity to make that decision based on their own circumstances. Why the hell should a 72 year old white man tell women what the can or can not do when it comes to their situation?

Kimberly:
They are furious about the disgusting tactics the Obama campaign has used against Sarah Palin
“Disgusting tactics” used against Sarah Palin?? What exactly did Obama do that was anything against Sarah Palin? This is the first ad mentioning her.

]]> By: kimberly4victory http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4038 kimberly4victory Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:39:48 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4038 If you read the hundreds of posts from Clinton supporters sites, feminist sites, etc., they are finally realizing that their right to choose is not the only reason to vote for Obama. They are furious about the disgusting tactics the Obama campaign has used against Sarah Palin - because it brings back memories of what was done to Hillary. Many are voting for McCain-Palin, not voting at all, or writing in Hillary's name (all three options are a vote AGAINST The one). If you read the hundreds of posts from Clinton supporters sites, feminist sites, etc., they are finally realizing that their right to choose is not the only reason to vote for Obama. They are furious about the disgusting tactics the Obama campaign has used against Sarah Palin - because it brings back memories of what was done to Hillary. Many are voting for McCain-Palin, not voting at all, or writing in Hillary’s name (all three options are a vote AGAINST The one).

]]> By: Blogs For Victory » Four Days of Smear, and We Still Love Her http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4033 Blogs For Victory » Four Days of Smear, and We Still Love Her Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:24:44 +0000 http://mccain.blogsforvictory.com/2008/09/03/barack-obama-figures-out-new-line-of-attack-against-palin/#comment-4033 [...] Obama tries to use the abortion issue to respond to Palin being on the [...] [...] Obama tries to use the abortion issue to respond to Palin being on the [...]

]]>